Sunday, October 4, 2009

A Pre-Reading VoiceThread

Bomar, S. (2009). A Pre-Reading VoiceThread: Death Comes for the Archbishop. Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 26-27. Retrieved September 11, 2009, from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database.

This article is a wonderful example of Voice Thread being used in a high school English classroom. I work at a high school, and we currently do not have an instructional technologist. All of our technology department is devoted to maintenance/upkeep of the technology; no one teaches the teachers about integrating technology. I was recently introduced to voice thread in another class, and I thought it would be great to teach the teachers at my school how to use it. This article provides an example of voice thread in the high school environment, and I think it would be very beneficial to an instructional technology person who was trying to help teachers use this website. In the article, high school honors English teacher Shannon Bomar writes about using Voice Thread to introduce the novel Death Comes for the Archbishop. The novel, a long-standing component of her department’s junior level English curriculum, was dreaded by the students. She wanted to develop a pre-reading activity to get the students involved with the novel and cut down on the negativity toward it. She worked with the school’s media specialist to create a Voice Thread assignment that allowed the students to make their own Voice Threads concerning various topics that would come up while reading the novel. Since I teach AP Literature, I am always looking for ways to introduce novels and themes, and I hope to utilize a project similar to Bomar’s during the upcoming semester.

Beyond Technology for Technology's Sake

Borsheim, C., Merritt, K., & Reed, D. (2008). Beyond technology for technology’s sake: Advancing multiliteracies in the twenty-first century. The Clearing House, 82(1), 87-90.

This article focuses on more than simply implementing technology in the classroom just for “technology’s sake” by discussing the benefits of teaching with a commitment to a multiliteracies pedagogy in order to help students “understand how to move between and across various modes and media as well as when and why they might draw on specific technologies to achieve specific purposes” (p. 88). The examples in the article relate to the English classroom, but the authors state a desire to reach audiences from all disciplines through their suggestions that reach across curricular boundaries. The article is divided into three categories concerning multiliteracies: multiliteracies in the traditional curriculum, multiliteracies beyond classroom walls, and multiliteracies for preservice teachers. In the traditional curriculum section, Borsheim discusses the importance of integrating technology even in the age of high stakes testing and mandated curricula. Merrit, in beyond classroom walls, discusses incorporating the technologies that students now use to communicate (text messaging, social networking sites, etc.) into the classroom as a way to engage students in reading and writing. When teaching preservice teachers, Reed encourages the use of wikis and blogs to help her students see how the kinds of technology they use in the classroom matter. The key to all of this technology use in the classroom is providing students with meaningful information about using new technologies in order to “enhance students’ abilities to use them as well as understand the complex ways they challenge us to participate in the world” (p. 90).

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Using Technology for Make-up Assignments

When students are absent from school, most of them are sent books and handouts for their makeup assignments. This article details how a South Carolina school is using technology to make that process more engaging and more effective. The classrooms are equipped with Smart Boards, so the teacher downloads files from the missed lesson to a bracelet that is sent home for the students to plug into their computer. These can contain items from the lesson such as powerpoint presentations. They are reporting that this method is very successful in engaging the students in the missed lesson which results in better performance from the students. Personally, I feel that this is a great use of technology. Any time that technology is used effectively, the lesson is greatly enhanced. This is definitely a method that would benefit many other schools.
Cloud Computing in K-12
http://preilly.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/k-12-cloud-computing-the-private-cloud/

This article looks at the trend of cloud computing and how it relates to K-12 education. Cloud computing represents a way to trim IT costs and it does have some applications in education. Basically, it provides software and/or applications as a web-based service and reduces the cost of maintenance and equipment. Another benefit is that it provides 24/7 access wherever there is an internet connection. Though many organizations are moving to this model (Google Apps is an example), schools can’t move 100% to the cloud model because certain student record applications may not be compatible and private student data would not be under direct control of the school district. The solution this article provides is to create several private clouds within the system. In my opinion, this model would be good in terms of being more accessible, but would not trim costs as much. My thought is that partially going to a cloud model in terms of programs such as email and office-type software would be more effective. This would allow access for users in the classroom and at home and help keep costs down, which is critical in these economic times.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

9 Principles

http://edtechpower.blogspot.com/2009/09/9-common-principles-for-21st-century.html

This article summarizes some important concerns for technology coordinators. There are nine common principles listed that all seem worth taking into account as a tech coordinator. The principles are: build community, encourage critical thinking, reward risk taking, focus on all learners, value diversity, nurture all learners, pursue innovation, teach empathy, and break down the walls. While these don’t all relate directly to integrating technology, they form a base that technology integration relies on. Though some relate more than others, I think the point of the article is that even technology integration must have the end result of creating effective learning environments for students.